"Robin H. Johnson" <[email protected]> writes:
> Specifically, if the author is NOT the same as the committer, then
> display both in the header. Otherwise continue to display only the
> author.
I too found myself wanting to see both of the names sometimes, and
the "fuller" format was added explicitly for that purpose.
Even though I agree "show only one, and both only when they are
different" is a reasonable and possibly useful format, it is out of
question to change what "--pretty=medium" does. It has been with us
forever and people and their scripts do rely on it.
It would be good if we can say
$ git log --pretty=robinsformat
but with a better name to show such an output.
Having said that, I'm moderately negative about adding it as yet
another hard-coded format. We simply have too many, and we do not
need one more. What we need instead is a flexible framework to let
users get what they want.
I think what needs to happen is:
* Enhance the "--pretty=format:" thing so that the current set of
hardcoded --pretty=medium,short,... formats and your modified
"medium" can be expressed as a custom format string.
* Introduce a configuration mechanism to allow users to define new
short-hand, e.g. if you have this in your $HOME/.gitconfig:
[pretty "robin"]
format = "commit %H%nAuthor: %an <%ae>%n..."
and run "git log --pretty=robin", it would behave as if you said
"git log --pretty="format:commit %H%nAuthor: %an <%ae>%n...".
* (optional) Replace the hardcoded implementations of pretty
formats with short-hand names like "medium", "short", etc. with a
built-in set of pretty.$name.format using the configuration
mechanism. But we need to make sure this does not hurt
performance for common cases.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
