Jacob Keller <jacob.e.kel...@intel.com> writes: > From: Jacob Keller <jacob.kel...@gmail.com> > > The documentation for --refs says that it will treat unqualified refs as > under refs/notes. Current behavior is to prefix refs/notes to all > strings that do not start with refs/notes or notes/, resulting in > performing actions on refs such as "refs/notes/refs/foo/bar" instead of > attempting to perform actions on "refs/foo/bar".
That actually sounds like a sensible thing to do, if you replace 'foo' with 'heads', for example, i.e. refs/notes/refs/heads/bar is a notes about commits reachable from the branch whose name is 'bar'. So given "refs/heads/bar", which is unqualified in the context of talking about references that hold notes trees, the current behaviour to turn it into "refs/notes/refs/heads/bar" is very sensible, I would think. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
