Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes:

>> Instead, stepping back a bit, I wonder if we can extend coverage of
>> the helpful message to all die() calls when running git-am. We could
>> just install a die routine with set_die_routine() in builtin/am.c.
>> Then, should die() be called anywhere, the helpful error message will
>> be printed as well.
>
> That could certainly be a valid approach and may give us a better
> end result.  If it works, it could be a change that is localized
> with a lot less impact.

I looked at the codepath involved, and I do not think that is a
feasible way forward in this case.  It is not about a "helpful
message" at all.  You would have to do everything that is done in
the error codepath in your custom die routine, which does not make
much sense.

I think the most sensible regression fix as the first step at this
point is to call it as a separate process, just like the code calls
"apply" as a separate process for each patch.  Optimization can come
later when it is shown that it matters---we need to regain
correctness first.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to