Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes: > So I dunno. I think it would be reasonable to provide a config option to > tell the cache-daemon to just ignore SIGHUP (or alternatively, a general > option to try harder to dissociate itself from the caller). But I'm not > sure I'd agree with making it the default. I'd want to know if anybody > is actually _using_ the SIGHUP-exits-daemon feature. Clearly neither of > us is, but I wouldn't be surprised if other setups are.
That also is a very good summary of what I think. I agree it is a good thing to have an option between "keep the die-on-HUP for those who have a working set-up that rely on it" and "daemonize fully and require the user to explicitly kill it with 'credential-cache exit'". Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
