On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Keller, Jacob E
<jacob.e.kel...@intel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-11-16 at 18:30 -0500, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>> Also, is it possible that some consumer down the road might want
>> richer output which includes the expansion of each alias? For
>> instance, it could emit the alias name as the first token on each
>> line
>> and the expansion as the remainder. Consumers interested in only the
>> alias name would grab the first token on the line and ignore
>> everything else.
>
> Maybe? The problem with printing the full address is that it may not be
> quoted or similar, and it makes the bash completion require an extra
> parameter.. I am not sure how valuable the alias expansion would be for
> use? The main concern I have is we'd need to use another process on top
> to extract only alias names.

It should be possible to extract the alias within the shell itself
without a separate process. For instance:

    read alias rest

will leave the first token in $alias and the remainder of the line in
$rest, and it's all done within the shell process.

>> New test(s) seem to be missing.
>
> I had removed the tests from the old version because they weren't
> necessary anymore. New ones wouldn't hurt here either, though.. I'll
> work on that.

I'm not sure which tests you mean, but I was referring to tests to
make sure that git-send-email recognizes --list-aliases (or
--dump-aliases if you switch to that) and that it produces the
expected output in the expected format.

Also, shouldn't --list-aliases (or --dump-aliases) be mutually
exclusive with many of the other options? New tests would check such
exclusivity as well.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to