Hi all It's pretty clear that code stored in a Git repository isn't considered a derived work of Git, regardless of whether it is used in a commercial context or otherwise.
However, I'm unable to find this stated in any authoritative and unambiguous manner. For example, http://www.sitepoint.com/public-license-explained/ has a pretty nasty disclaimer at the end. Would it be possible to make an unambiguous, authoritative statement on your website, or something like that, that would make commercial adoption more appealing? Thank you! Jonathan ____________________________________________________________ This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
