On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Josh Triplett <[email protected]> wrote: > If you clone a repository, and the connection drops, the next attempt > will have to start from scratch. This can add significant time and > expense if you're on a low-bandwidth or metered connection trying to > clone something like Linux. > > Would it be possible to make git clone resumable after a partial clone? > (And, ideally, to make that the default?) > > In a discussion elsewhere, Al Viro suggested taking the partial pack > received so far, repairing any truncation, indexing the objects it > contains, and then re-running clone and not having to fetch those > objects. This may also require extending receive-pack's protocol for > determining objects the recipient already has, as the partial pack may > not have a consistent set of reachable objects. > > Before starting down the path of developing patches for this, does the > approach seem potentially reasonable?
This topic came up recently (thanks Sarah!) and Shawn proposed a different approach that (I think) is simpler and more effective for resume _clone_ case. I'm not sure if anybody is implementing it though. [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/285921 -- Duy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
