On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Jeff King <p...@peff.net> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 05:37:03PM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote: > >> A much easier solution would be to update OPT_VERBOSE() to understand >> that negative values are "unspecified", and then --verbose would >> (pseudocode): >> >> if (value < 0) >> value = 0 >> value++; >> >> and --no-verbose would: >> >> value = 0 >> >> That should be compatible with existing clients of OPT__VERBOSE() >> which initialize the value to 0, and should satisfy Pranit's case; he >> can initialize it to -1, and if it is still -1 when option parsing is >> done, then he knows that neither --verbose nor --no-verbose was seen. > > Yes, that makes much more sense to me. Thanks for the back-story. > > -Peff
Is there any command which needs more than one --no-verbose? (as an abuse to stacking --quiet multiple times)? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
