Hi, On Thu, 7 Apr 2016, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Reverts can typically be treated like squash. Eliminating both the > original commit and the revert would be even nicer, but this seems a bit > harder to implement. Whoa. This rings a lot of alarm bells, very loudly. It seems you intend to introduce a *major* change in behavior, and all we get to convince us that this is a good change is this puny paragraph (which, by the way, does not do half a good job of explaining to me what you think this patch is supposed to do, let alone of convincing me that what you want is a good change). So. What is it again that you want to achieve? Please use plain English, e.g. explaining how exactly reverts are typically to be treated like squashes. And please make it convincing, because so far, I am far from convinced. Ciao, Johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
