Matthieu Moy <matthieu....@grenoble-inp.fr> writes: > Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> writes: > >> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: >> >>> here, create a "GitHub-Travis CI hints" section just before "MUA >>> specific hints" section, >> >> Somebody (I think it was you, Lars?) at GitMerge suggested to break >> up the SubmittingPatches document into more than one, i.e. >> the MUA hints and the Github-Travis hints could become their own documents, >> and the SubmittingPatches could just contain the bare essentials. > > I didn't see it on-list, but there's a PR doing that here: > > https://github.com/git/git/pull/223
I guess submitGit did not work well there ;-)? To save one round-trip, I do not think it is unreasonable to treat submitGit as the first-class MUA that sits next to other recommended ways to send the patches to the list. It is a rough equivalent to "format-patch and then send-email". As long as what appears on list is the authoritative and final form of contribution, those on the receiving end should not (and would not) care how the patch e-mail was prepared and sent. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
