Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> writes: > Actually we would only need to have the empty line count in the > second loop as the first loop shifted it as much up(backwards) as > possible, such that the hunk sits on one end of the movable > range. The second loop would iterate over the whole range, so that > would be the only place needed to count.
The description makes me wonder if we can do without two loops ;-) That is, can we teach the first loop not to be so aggressive to shift "as much as possible" but notice there is an empty line we would want to treat specially? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
