Hmph, two patches in the previous series seem to be missing. On purpose, or by mistake? Their net-effect is shown at the end of this message, and I thought they made sense.
Puzzled... diff --git a/builtin/branch.c b/builtin/branch.c index 5ab106b..32be954 100644 --- a/builtin/branch.c +++ b/builtin/branch.c @@ -369,12 +369,14 @@ static char *get_head_description(void) strbuf_addf(&desc, _("(no branch, bisect started on %s)"), state.branch); else if (state.detached_from) { - /* TRANSLATORS: make sure these match _("HEAD detached at ") - and _("HEAD detached from ") in wt-status.c */ if (state.detached_at) + /* TRANSLATORS: make sure this matches + "HEAD detached at " in wt-status.c */ strbuf_addf(&desc, _("(HEAD detached at %s)"), state.detached_from); else + /* TRANSLATORS: make sure this matches + "HEAD detached from " in wt-status.c */ strbuf_addf(&desc, _("(HEAD detached from %s)"), state.detached_from); } @@ -828,8 +830,8 @@ int cmd_branch(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) if (argc == 1 && track == BRANCH_TRACK_OVERRIDE && !branch_existed && remote_tracking) { fprintf(stderr, _("\nIf you wanted to make '%s' track '%s', do this:\n\n"), head, branch->name); - fprintf(stderr, _(" git branch -d %s\n"), branch->name); - fprintf(stderr, _(" git branch --set-upstream-to %s\n"), branch->name); + fprintf(stderr, " git branch -d %s\n", branch->name); + fprintf(stderr, " git branch --set-upstream-to %s\n", branch->name); } } else -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html