Hmph, two patches in the previous series seem to be missing.  On
purpose, or by mistake?  Their net-effect is shown at the end of
this message, and I thought they made sense.

Puzzled...

diff --git a/builtin/branch.c b/builtin/branch.c
index 5ab106b..32be954 100644
--- a/builtin/branch.c
+++ b/builtin/branch.c
@@ -369,12 +369,14 @@ static char *get_head_description(void)
                strbuf_addf(&desc, _("(no branch, bisect started on %s)"),
                            state.branch);
        else if (state.detached_from) {
-               /* TRANSLATORS: make sure these match _("HEAD detached at ")
-                  and _("HEAD detached from ") in wt-status.c */
                if (state.detached_at)
+                       /* TRANSLATORS: make sure this matches
+                          "HEAD detached at " in wt-status.c */
                        strbuf_addf(&desc, _("(HEAD detached at %s)"),
                                state.detached_from);
                else
+                       /* TRANSLATORS: make sure this matches
+                          "HEAD detached from " in wt-status.c */
                        strbuf_addf(&desc, _("(HEAD detached from %s)"),
                                state.detached_from);
        }
@@ -828,8 +830,8 @@ int cmd_branch(int argc, const char **argv, const char 
*prefix)
                if (argc == 1 && track == BRANCH_TRACK_OVERRIDE &&
                    !branch_existed && remote_tracking) {
                        fprintf(stderr, _("\nIf you wanted to make '%s' track 
'%s', do this:\n\n"), head, branch->name);
-                       fprintf(stderr, _("    git branch -d %s\n"), 
branch->name);
-                       fprintf(stderr, _("    git branch --set-upstream-to 
%s\n"), branch->name);
+                       fprintf(stderr, "    git branch -d %s\n", branch->name);
+                       fprintf(stderr, "    git branch --set-upstream-to 
%s\n", branch->name);
                }
 
        } else
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to