On 2016-05-06 03:57 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Marc Branchaud <marcn...@xiplink.com> writes:

On 2016-05-06 02:54 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:

I wonder if can we come up with a short and sweet notation to remind
futhre readers that this "initialization" is not initializing but
merely squelching warnings from stupid compilers, and agree to use
it consistently?

Perhaps

        #define COMPILER_UNINITIALIZED_WARNING_INITIALIZER 0

or, for short-and-sweet

        #define CUWI 0

?

:)

I get that smiley.

Of course, right after I sent that I thought of

#define SPURIOUS_COMPILER_RELATED_UNINITIALIZED_WARNING_INITIALIZER 0

or

#define SCRUWI 0

Which we'd get to pronounce as "screwy".

OK, I'll shut up now.

                M.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to