Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> writes: >> The patches in the earliest part of the series have been sent to the >> list already; there is no substantial change (I think I made a >> typofix in the commit log message found by Eric). > > and a new patch got added here: > > attr.c: tighten constness around "git_attr" structure > > I cannot find it on the list though?
Just like everybody else has private "wip" version to be sent to the list, I have my own. I haven't had enough time to cook v3 yet into a publishable state yet. > So I wondered when you prefix the subject of the patches with "attr.c:" > and when with "attr:". The early ones with label attr.c are meant to be "good clean-ups, whether we decide to go with API update or not, that can live standalone outside the series"; the remainders may have been better labeled with fully-spelled "attributes:", perhaps, as that is not about the attr.c file alone, but is about the whole attributes subsystem. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
