Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes:
> Vasco Almeida <vascomalme...@sapo.pt> writes:
>
>> Alternatively, we could leave sed alone as it were before this patch and
>> use test_i18ngrep instead of grep to fake success under GETTEXT_POISON.
>> I think I prefer this way. What do you think?
>
> That is equivalent to saying that "we would translate 'lgf' to
> end-user's language", which does not make much sense to me.
>
> Wouldn't the introductory explanation, up to "Did you mean this?",
> be the only thing that is translated?
I just checked the code ;-) We do this:
fprintf_ln(stderr,
Q_("\nDid you mean this?",
"\nDid you mean one of these?",
n));
for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
fprintf(stderr, "\t%s\n", main_cmds.names[i]->name);
Using test_i18ngrep would mean we would not be able to catch a
potential future bug that does an equivalent of
for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
fprintf(stderr, "\t%s\n", _(main_cmds.names[i]->name));
in the loop, i.e. marking something that is not meant to be
translated as translatable.
As long as translators do not translate "Did you mean..." to begin a
line with a tab (which I do not think there is any reason to), it is
going to work reliably to grep for "^ lgf$" here, and it will catch
such a potential future bug under GETTEXT_POISON build.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
