On May 24, 2016 12:08 PM, Matthieu Moy wrote: > > So, when trying a forbidden push, Git would deny it and the only way > > to force the push would be to remove the blacklist from the config, right? > > > > Probably the sanest way to go. I thought about adding a "git push > > --force-even-if-in-blacklist" or so, but I don't think the feature > > deserves one specific option (hence add some noise in `git push -h`). > > Yeah, I agree --even-if-in-blacklist is a road to madness, but I wonder how > this is different from setting pushURL to /dev/null or something illegal and > replace that phony configuration value when you really need to push?
May be missing the point, but isn't the original intent to provide policy-based to control the push destinations? A sufficiently knowledgeable person, being a couple of weeks into git, would easily see that the config points to a black-listed destination and easily bypass it with a config update, rendering all this pointless? This seems to me to be a lot of effort to go to for limited value - unless immutable attributes are going to be obtained from the upstream repository - which also seems to run counter to the whole point. Confusededly, Randall -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
