Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes: > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 07:57:43PM +0200, Matthieu Moy wrote: > >> Samuel GROOT <samuel.gr...@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr> writes: >> >> > Since 2.8.3 was out recently, we could flip MAN_BOLD_LITERAL on by >> > default for this cycle to shake out problems as Jeff King suggested >> > [2]. >> >> 2.8.3 was a bufix release, and flipping a controversial flag should >> clearly not be done on a bugfix release. So, in this context, "beginning >> of a cycle" means after a x.y.0 release. >> >> Anyway, a patch enabling MAN_BOLD_LITERAL by default would need to cook >> in pu and next as any other patches, so the time when the patch is sent >> does not really matter. > > Yeah, I think a reasonable plan is: > > 1. Somebody produces a patch flipping the default. The patch is > trivial, but the commit message should tell why, and try to dig up > any possible problems we might see (e.g., why wasn't this the > default? Particular versions of tools? Some platforms?)
"git log -SBOLD_LITERAL Documentation/" tells me that it's not like we had this on by default sometime in the past and then we flipped the default back in response to some problems (which I forgot about). I just re-read the two iterations that introduced BOLD_LITERAL: * http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=<1237881866-5497-1-git-send-email-chris_john...@pobox.com> * http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=<1238136245-22853-1-git-send-email-chris_john...@pobox.com> There was no particular "caveat" raised there to recommend against using this on particular versions of tools or platforms. It was inertia that has kept the new optional feature "optional". > 2. Assuming no problems, Junio merges the patch to "next". We get > any reports of issues from people using "next" day-to-day. So I can do these steps myself up to this point. After waiting for a few days to see if somebody else with better memory tells me what I forgot, perhaps. > 3. Assuming no problems, Junio merges to "master". We hit more people > (who build from master). And also it would be part of the > pre-generated pages that Junio ships, so we might get reports > there. > > 4. Eventually it's released. We hope to get no problem reports there, > though it _does_ hit a wider audience at that point. > > Steps 1 and 2 can happen now. As we are in the -rc cycle right now, > probably step 3 would happen post-v2.9. But there's no reason not to > start the clock ticking now. > > -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
