Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 4:45 AM, David Turner
<dtur...@twopensource.com> wrote:
> > diff --git a/read-cache.c b/read-cache.c
> > index 1719f5a..8ec4be3 100644
> > --- a/read-cache.c
> > +++ b/read-cache.c
> > @@ -1235,7 +1235,7 @@ int refresh_index(struct index_state *istate,
unsigned int flags,
> > if (!new) {
> > const char *fmt;
> >
> > - if (really && cache_errno == EINVAL) {
> > + if (really || cache_errno == EINVAL) {
> > /* If we are doing --really-refresh
that
> > * means the index is not valid
anymore.
> > */
>
> This looks really odd. I don't see why we would need this. It seems
> first appeared in your "do not apply" patch [1]. Maybe leftover?
>
> I found this while re-reading the series and I have not put much time
> in studying this code yet. So I may be wrong. I'll post again if I
> find that it's true after some more staring.
I don't remember the exact details here, but I think we needed this so
that we would ever refresh a file that watchman told us had been
modified. We definitely were missing some invalidation if we didn't
have it.
P.S. Please CC nova...@novalis.org on these emails as I don't always
check the git mailing list.
P.P.S. Since I don't have the original message in my mailbox, I am
trying something weird to send this message with a correct in-reply-to
header. I something ends up screwed up, I apologize.
--
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
