> On 27 Jun 2016, at 18:09, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: > > larsxschnei...@gmail.com writes: > >> Unfortunately that fix helps only with cloning. Any local Git operation >> that invokes the clean/smudge filter (e.g. switching branches) is still >> slow. > > Do you know where the slowness comes from? Does Joey's new > clean/smudge interface help GitLFS?
I am pretty sure the startup time of the external clean/smudge process causes the slowness and consequently I don't think Joey's patch would help. The following tests makes me believe that: I ran the same test as in my original email using the repo with 15,000 LFS files. Instead of the LFS binary I use the fast and simple shell built-in `true` command: $ git -c filter.lfs.smudge=true -c filter.lfs.clean=true clone https://github.com/larsxschneider/lfstest-manyfiles.git $ cd lfstest-manyfiles/ $ time git -c filter.lfs.smudge=true -c filter.lfs.clean=true checkout removed-files real 0m47.030s user 0m29.521s sys 0m16.993s It still takes 47 seconds to switch the branch. Does this test prove my point or do you see a flaw in the test? > You are not likely to get anything that knows that a blob object may > be named as anything other than SHA-1("blob <len>" + <contents>) to > Git core. The remote-object-store idea that was floated by Peff and > Christian started running with at least maintains that object naming > property and has a better chance of interacting better with the core, > but LFS, Annex or anything that would not preserve the object naming > would not. > > Personally, I view a surrogate blob left by LFS in the tree object > and filtered via clean/smudge a "smarter" kind of symbolic link that > points outside what Git controls. The area outside what Git > controls is left to be managed by whatever the add-on does; Git > shouldn't even be aware of how they are structured and/or managed. I understand and somewhat anticipated your point of view. I will try to find a less intrusive solution. @Christian/Peff: Is there a place to look for more info about your remote-object-store idea? Thanks, Lars-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
