Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 8:18 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: >> Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> Makes sense. But then if opt->ignore_case is false and regflags >>> happens to have REG_ICASE set, should we clear it as well? >> >> I think .ignore_case is set iff '-i' is given, and .regflags has >> REG_ICASE only if '-i' is given and the user said she does not want >> literal string match (i.e. no '-F'). >> >> So... can .regflags have REG_ICASE when .ignore_case is false? > > Yeah reg_icase is more like a subset of ignore_case. Ignore what I wrote.
The rule of the game can be updated to make whoever looks at .ignore_case currently instead look at .regflags & REG_ICASE; that way, we could remove .ignore_case and stop worrying about one is subset of the other. It is just it felt funny to be mucking with .regflags when the user explicitly said -F, and that is why they are separate. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
