Torsten Bögershausen <tbo...@web.de> writes:
>> And then with this further on top:
>>
>> diff --git a/merge-recursive.c b/merge-recursive.c
>> index b880ae5..628c8ed 100644
>> --- a/merge-recursive.c
>> +++ b/merge-recursive.c
>> @@ -202,6 +202,9 @@ static int add_cacheinfo(unsigned int mode, const
>> unsigned char *sha1,
>> const char *path, int stage, int refresh, int options)
>> {
>> struct cache_entry *ce;
>> +
>> + if (!stage)
>> + remove_file_from_cache(path);
>> ce = make_cache_entry(mode, sha1 ? sha1 : null_sha1, path, stage,
>> (refresh ? (CE_MATCH_REFRESH |
>> CE_MATCH_IGNORE_MISSING) : 0 ));
>>
> Thanks :-)
> Did that experiment made it to a branch somewhere ?
Not yet. As I called it "experiment", it was merely to demonstrate
that there are less intrusive ways to kill the "safer crlf" we may
want to consider first before passing an extra blob object name
around.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
