Hi Andreas, On Tue, 12 Jul 2016, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin <schinde...@wisc.edu> writes: > > >> PRIuMAX isn't compatible with time_t. > > > > That statement is wrong. > > No, it isn't. PRIuMAX is for uintmax_t, and time_t is not uintmax_t > (even if they happen to have the same representation). Sigh. So if it is wrong, what is right? I hoped that my gentle reprimand in my previous reply would result in a more helpful response. Let me guess: PRId64 is what you would have suggested if you had followed up your negative statement with a "do this instead"? Ciao, Johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
