On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Johannes Schindelin
<johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> wrote:
> When reporting broken links between commits/trees/blobs, it would be
> quite helpful at times if the user would be told how the object is
> supposed to be reachable.
>
> With the new --name-objects option, git-fsck will try to do exactly
> that: name the objects in a way that shows how they are reachable.
> [...]
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de>
> ---
> diff --git a/builtin/fsck.c b/builtin/fsck.c
> @@ -576,6 +598,7 @@ static struct option fsck_opts[] = {
>         OPT_BOOL(0, "lost-found", &write_lost_and_found,
>                                 N_("write dangling objects in 
> .git/lost-found")),
>         OPT_BOOL(0, "progress", &show_progress, N_("show progress")),
> +       OPT_BOOL(0, "name-objects", &name_objects, N_("show verbose names for 
> rechable objects")),

s/rechable/reachable/

>         OPT_END(),
>  };
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to