Hi Zsolt, On Mon, 18 Jul 2016, Herczeg Zsolt wrote:
> >> I think converting is a much better option. Use a single-hash > >> storage, and convert everything to that on import/clone/pull. > > > > That ignores two very important issues that I already had mentioned: > > That's not true. If you double-check the next part of my message, you I > just showed that an automatic two-way mapping could solve these > problems! (I even give briefs explanation how to handle referencing and > signature verification in those cases.) > > My point is not to throw out old hashes and break signatures. My point > is to convert the data storage, and use mapping to resolve problems > with those old hashes and signatures. If you convert the data storage, then the SHA-1s listed in the commit objects will have to be rewritten, and then the GPG signature will not match anymore. Call e.g. `git cat-file commit 44cc742a8ca17b9c279be4cc195a93a6ef7a320e` to see the anatomy of a gpg-signed commit object. Ciao, Johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
