Torsten Bögershausen <tbo...@web.de> writes:
> On 07/25/2016 06:53 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Pranit Bauva <pranit.ba...@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>>>> >>> +enum terms_defined {
>>>>> >>> + TERM_BAD = 1,
>>>>> >>> + TERM_GOOD = 2,
>>>>> >>> + TERM_NEW = 4,
>>>>> >>> + TERM_OLD = 8
>>>>> >>> +};
>>>>> >>> +
>>>> >> ...
> Is there any risk that a more generic term like "TERM_BAD" may collide
> with some other definition some day ?
>
> Would it make sense to call it GIT_BISECT_TERM_BAD, GBS_TERM_BAD,
> BIS_TERM_BAD or something more unique ?
I am not sure if the scope of these symbols would ever escape
outside bisect-helper.c (and builtin/bisect.c eventually when we
retire git-bisect.sh), but BISECT_TERM_{GOOD,BAD,OLD,NEW} would not
be too bad.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
