On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yeah. If the libification movement is going strong, we can start > converting and at some point should be able to define > NO_THE_INDEX_COMPATIBILITY_MACROS globally (and avoid the_index along > the way) > > Without that, there is a risk. I looked at 'nm apply.o | grep ' [Uu] > '' and I don't see any external functions that would potentially > access the index, except ll_merge. Again there's a good chance I may > have missed something. > >> So it looks like it is a very big and different project to make the >> current libified code be explicit about which index it is using. >> And by the way perhaps this other project should just remove the >> "the_index" global altogether. > > This is probably the way to go. But it's the boring sort of work that > nobody wants to do :(
Do you mean that it might be a source of micro-projects for the next GSoC or Outreachy? ;-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
