On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 01:47:24PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 12:11:05PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > Josh Triplett (2): > > format-patch: Add a config option format.from to set the default for > > --from > > format-patch: Default to --from > > By the way, I notice that the threading between your patches and cover > letter are broken. Since I see you are also working on a tool for > handling such things, I'd suspect the tool (or your workflow) has a bug. > :)
My workflow, fortunately. :) > The message-id of this message is: > > <20160730191104.2ps5k7eji7aqgufg@x> > > but the patches have both "References" and "In-Reply-To" set to: > > > <cover.4d006cadf197f80d899ad7d7d56d8ba41f574adf.1469905775.git-series.j...@joshtriplett.org> > > I also see your MUA is mutt, and I think I saw you mention using "mutt > -H" elsewhere. IIRC, when I started using a similar workflow years ago, > I tried the same thing and had the same problem: "-H" treats the input > file as a template, not a message, and thus generates a new message-id. > > I switched to using mutt's internal "resend-message" function, which > does a more literal re-send. I don't think I ever found a way to > convince mutt to do a resend from the command line. I actually tried using mutt's resend function (alt-e) with an mbox; I checked the Message-Id and In-Reply-To headers, and they looked correct. I've used mutt -H successfully before without breaking threads. The Debian mutt packages recently upgraded to the "neomutt" fork; I wonder if something broke recently? Thanks for letting me know; I'll investigate and try to figure out the problem. - Josh Triplett -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
