Hi Junio,

On Wed, 3 Aug 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> writes:
> 
> > ... my Git garden shears [*1*] (essentially, what
> > git rebase --interactive --preserve-merges *should* have been).
> 
> Any plan to fold it into "git rebase -i" as a new (improved) mode of
> operation, by the way?

It was my plan to integrate it into the sequencer, once the rebase--helper
landed in `master`. Little did I know how long it would take to get this
done...

My loose idea was to deprecate --preserve-merges after introducing a
--recreate-branches, or some such. But enough of that. The rebase--helper
needs to get here first.

> > However, I could imagine that we actually want this to be more extensible.
> > After all, all you are doing is to introduce a new rebase -i command that
> > does nothing else than shelling out to a command.
> 
> Yup, I tend to agree.

Awesome!

Ciao,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to