michaelpearce-gain edited a comment on issue #4: AMQNET-589: Failover implementation URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-amqp/pull/4#issuecomment-511584883 So i think first state is to get functionality inline with Qpid JMS, glad we're aligned there. I think a disucssion on if the client should handle the other case and how it should, probably should start over with Qpid JMS where we are taking our design and impl detail from, as their lib has been production tested and run, also i know they have some people who actually contribute to AMQP spec in their PMC, so will be much better placed to discuss correct details and where that responsibility should be (e.g. clieint should handle, or it really is a broker pre req) . Maybe we could start a thread there, and possible implmentation pr in java first there? Im not against it, i just want really the two to be aligned, and at this stage i think Qpid JMS kinda is the lead, whilst we are still very much not even released.
---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
