kasakrisz commented on code in PR #5781:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hive/pull/5781#discussion_r2074980905


##########
ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/Context.java:
##########
@@ -361,8 +361,16 @@ private DestClausePrefix getMergeDestClausePrefix(ASTNode 
curNode) {
     assert insert != null && insert.getType() == HiveParser.TOK_INSERT;
     ASTNode query = (ASTNode) insert.getParent();
     assert query != null && query.getType() == HiveParser.TOK_QUERY;
-
-    int tokFromIdx = 
query.getFirstChildWithType(HiveParser.TOK_FROM).getChildIndex();
+    ASTNode from = (ASTNode) query.getFirstChildWithType(HiveParser.TOK_FROM);

Review Comment:
   In case of ACID we always use `merge on read` and the merge statement is 
rewritten to a multi insert statement. In case of such statements only the from 
clause (query clause, the merge and using clause of the merge)  of the 
statement is optimized by CBO. This is usually a query with a join of the 
target and source tables. If the source is a query the plan can be more 
complex. However the predicate causing the always empty result is in the when 
matched clause of the merge (one of the insert branches of the multi insert) so 
it doesn't appear in the CBO plan and we can't end up with a 
`HiveValues(tuples=[[]])` CBO plan.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: gitbox-unsubscr...@hive.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: gitbox-unsubscr...@hive.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: gitbox-h...@hive.apache.org

Reply via email to