> it means one submenu level "a-f", "g-m", "n-p", "q-z"
This is hard to internalise, learning the arbitrary ranges. If I want JS, I can't instantly know which sub menu it is. It doesn't take long though, but it's nice to avoid this for UX. > don't need to be a "programming language nerd" to guess a category My categories are clearer than Matthews, but yes probably some users won't know about static Vs dynamic typing - they would hopefully pick up the distinction by inspecting the contents. Or we could keep the status quo and add C Family and Functional. These categories are known by their users. > don't hard code some set of groups, I don't think users will bother to redefine these groups, why support that? Also did you see my 2nd comment about user-set ungrouped filetypes? > for gods sake > its just plain arrogance on the developers part Please can we avoid emotive language and stick to constructive criticism? I'm anxious, my heart is beating fast as I type this. It just makes collaboration more difficult. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/2087#issuecomment-497925710
