> 2\. We store our own information to the tags like TMTagType which are useful > e.g. for unit tests and we should also be able to do this for the ctags tag > format - I think we could introduce our own extension fields for this.
Is there any use of that field apart for testing our mappings? Anyhow, we should not *depend* on this field, but we sure can add any one we like for our own purposes, we just cannot really depend on that field being present. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/2666#issuecomment-735939621
