> In Python, there is no point in having multiple __init__ methods. While > technically possible, it makes no sense because the latter method overrides > the previous one. The script here would probably pick one of them, I don't > know which one, it is decided by the inspect library.
Ah, OK, I thought you could have `__init__(self, a)` and `__init__(self, a, b)` but after checking now, there can only be one `__init__()` in python. > Sure we can do that. But IMO both ideas would be better handled in seperate > PRs to not blow this one even more. Yeah, sure. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/3039#issuecomment-1315841429 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <geany/geany/pull/3039/c1315841...@github.com>
