> No its named right, its the count of the number of characters the same, it > needs one subtracted because C is 0 based indexing, but having 0 characters > the same is hard to detect as markup :-)
Yep, I got this one wrong. > Although > [this](https://github.com/geany/geany/blob/ae1f499e3b2fa108d749942008431ec1aaf0294b/ctags/parsers/asciidoc.c#L379) > compares <= 6 whereas the > [original](https://github.com/geany/geany/blob/f227076dc425052b85091e495b04f6d5b7a3f965/tagmanager/ctags/asciidoc.c#L195) > did <= 5 probably lucky it didn't overflow the kinds array. Thats what I > mean something changed somewhere. But it looks like not enough changed, maybe > someone started and never finished the change. Notice, though, that the original only supported level 4 sections (i.e. 5 `=`), see https://github.com/geany/geany/blob/f227076dc425052b85091e495b04f6d5b7a3f965/tagmanager/ctags/asciidoc.c#L42 while the current ctags parser supports level 5 sections (i.e. 6 `=`), see https://github.com/geany/geany/blob/ae1f499e3b2fa108d749942008431ec1aaf0294b/ctags/parsers/asciidoc.c#L58 The `n_same` variable comparison is against the number of `=` which is +1 than the index to the table. So I think this is correct. > Historically IIRC (its a looooong time ago) it was originally designed to > mainly handle sections with the heading underlined by a line of the same > length, of which there are only four levels, but those are now correctly > deprecated in Asciidoc since they don't work with variable width fonts, and > are shaky with Asian double width characters, and really bad with other > Unicode characters of zero, half, and one and a half width. That would > explain the comment > [here](https://github.com/geany/geany/blob/ae1f499e3b2fa108d749942008431ec1aaf0294b/ctags/parsers/asciidoc.c#L43). I actually based the new markdown parser on the asciidoc parser with the same limitation of the number of sections so this one could be increased too. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/3411#issuecomment-1443556064 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <geany/geany/issues/3411/1443556...@github.com>