> stable", I'm kind of neutral here. But in the spirit of linux kernel 
> numbering "when the number behind the dot gets too big, let's bump the major 
> version", it's a good move.)

I didn't know this is the Linux kernel numbering scheme but it's pragmatic :). 
Actually, I happened to confused myself a few times in the past by not exactly 
remembering if the current version is 1.37, .38 or .39.
2.0 vs 2.1 is really easier to remember and distinguish.


> I don't care actually, I'd have went with 1.23456789 until the end of times, 
> but I'm not saying it's a good idea đŸ˜„ If you like 2.0, let's do it.

We just need to reach 3.1 and then all following releases will give one more 
precision level of pi. In a few years we might have 3.141592 or so :).

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/3569#issuecomment-1749645271
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <geany/geany/pull/3569/c1749645...@github.com>

Reply via email to