> Looks good to me based on the code itself and I think it could go to 2.0. I > just haven't tested it yet (which I'm going to do now).
I just tested it and, yes, it is fixed, and, yes, the re-arrangement is really annoying without this patch so I think it should go to 2.0. (Somehow, I didn't have the option to place new tabs behind the current one enabled so I didn't notice the problem.) One unrelated glitch I noticed is that when you close Geany with some files opened, and then open it from the command-line with some file as an argument, this file is always opened in the second tab - I would expect it to open behind the tab which was last active when Geany closed. I expect that when the command-line file gets opened, the "current" file is still the first one so it appears behind it. But not really a big problem and maybe even not worth fixing as users hopefully forget which tab was active when they closed Geany :-). -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/3611#issuecomment-1768537925 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <geany/geany/pull/3611/c1768537...@github.com>
