> I thought of it, but I don't know… on one hand it indeed allows accessing a 
> lot more stuff if need be, and we could even make sure the extension got 
> unregistered on plugin unload (so a plugin forgetting to unregister wouldn't 
> crash, although I wouldn't love authors to disregard deregistration), but it 
> also means that it's not possible to discriminate several extensions 
> registered by a single plugin, which might (or might not) be an issue for 
> e.g. Peasy-based plugins (not that I can tell whether this API is 
> Peasy-friendly to begin with).

Oh sure, multiple extensions provided by a single plugin - we must have that! 
:-)

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/3849#issuecomment-2161557376
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <geany/geany/pull/3849/c2161557...@github.com>

Reply via email to