techee left a comment (geany/geany#4303) > https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/4330 fixes the <%= case but not the <?= > one (which isn't surprising to me. I'll try and see to this
The fix is great and it's definitely a good thing for correct parsing, but again, I think ctags main should make sure such things don't happen because parsers can be tricky to get right. I think ctags should record all promises made during parsing a file and when it detects a promise that is identical to an existing promise (or an already parsed promise), it should discard such a promise. I'll have a look at this to see if I can prepare something like this easily. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/4303#issuecomment-2970616739 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <geany/geany/pull/4303/[email protected]>
