eht16 left a comment (geany/geany#4371) > Re GP license: him, yeah… ideally we'd have a license summary in the repo > root. I'm not sure if github can show multiple licenses, but at least we > could help humans. It should be mostly GPL2+, but there probably are others, > yet it would be a bug if not everything is OSS -- and annoying if not > everything is GPL-compatible…
Oh, I wasn't really aware we don't have clear license information in the G-P repo :(. I agree that it should be mostly GPLv2+ as Geany. There are exceptions but the majority is GPLv2+. We could probably take more care in future additions to not spread the used licenses even more. > Err admittedly I've been quite a bit more lax than I should be in keeping > `debian/copyright` up to date, but here it is: > https://salsa.debian.org/geany-team/geany-plugins/-/blob/master/debian/copyright?ref_type=heads This is great. What if we use this as a base and so maybe can co-maintain the list (G-P and Debian)? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/4371#issuecomment-3066714190 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <geany/geany/pull/4371/[email protected]>
