houqp commented on a change in pull request #2054:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/2054#discussion_r835825990



##########
File path: datafusion/src/logical_plan/builder.rs
##########
@@ -1090,6 +1094,101 @@ pub(crate) fn expand_wildcard(
     }
 }
 
+/// check whether the logical plan we are building is valid
+fn check_plan_invalid(plan: &LogicalPlan) -> Option<DataFusionError> {
+    match plan {
+        LogicalPlan::Projection(Projection { expr, input, .. })
+        | LogicalPlan::Sort(Sort { expr, input })
+        | LogicalPlan::Window(Window {
+            window_expr: expr,
+            input,
+            ..
+        }) => check_plan_invalid(input)
+            .or_else(|| check_any_invalid_expr(expr, input.schema())),
+
+        LogicalPlan::Filter(Filter {
+            predicate: expr,
+            input,
+        }) => {
+            check_plan_invalid(input).or_else(|| check_invalid_expr(expr, 
input.schema()))
+        }
+
+        LogicalPlan::Aggregate(Aggregate {
+            input,
+            group_expr,
+            aggr_expr,
+            ..
+        }) => {
+            let schema = input.schema();
+            check_plan_invalid(input)
+                .or_else(|| check_any_invalid_expr(group_expr, schema))
+                .or_else(|| check_any_invalid_expr(aggr_expr, schema))
+        }
+
+        LogicalPlan::Join(Join { left, right, .. })
+        | LogicalPlan::CrossJoin(CrossJoin { left, right, .. }) => {
+            check_plan_invalid(left).or_else(|| check_plan_invalid(right))
+        }
+
+        LogicalPlan::Repartition(Repartition { input, .. })
+        | LogicalPlan::Limit(Limit { input, .. })
+        | LogicalPlan::Explain(Explain { plan: input, .. })
+        | LogicalPlan::Analyze(Analyze { input, .. }) => 
check_plan_invalid(input),
+
+        LogicalPlan::Union(Union { inputs, .. }) => {
+            inputs.iter().filter_map(check_plan_invalid).next()
+        }
+
+        LogicalPlan::TableScan(TableScan {
+            table_name: _,
+            source,
+            projection,
+            projected_schema,
+            filters,
+            limit: _,
+        }) => {
+            if let Some(projection) = projection {
+                if projection.len() > projected_schema.fields().len() {
+                    return Some(DataFusionError::Plan(
+                        "projection contains columns that doesnt belong to 
projected schema"
+                            .to_owned(),
+                    ));
+                }
+            }
+            let schema = &source.schema().to_dfschema_ref().ok()?;
+            check_any_invalid_expr(filters, schema)
+        }
+
+        _ => None,
+    }
+}
+
+/// find first error in the exprs
+fn check_any_invalid_expr(
+    exprs: &[Expr],
+    schema: &DFSchemaRef,
+) -> Option<DataFusionError> {
+    exprs
+        .iter()
+        .filter_map(|e| check_invalid_expr(e, schema))
+        .next()
+}

Review comment:
       how about:
   
   ```rust
   for expr in exprs { 
       check_invalid_expr(expr, schema)?
   }
   Ok(())
   ```
   
   You can also use 
https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/iter/trait.Iterator.html#method.try_for_each




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to