vibhatha commented on PR #14143:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/14143#issuecomment-1248791365
> FYI @westonpace @vibhatha,
>
> Substrait plans produced by duckdb don't even include the extensionUris at
the moment.
>
> For example a plan would look like this:
>
> ```
> {
> "extensions": [
> {
> "extensionFunction": {
> "functionAnchor": 1,
> "name": "add"
> }
> }
> ],
> "relations": [
> {
> ```
>
> Whereas an isthmus produced plan, may look like this:
>
> ```
> {
> "extensionUris": [{
> "extensionUriAnchor": 1,
> "uri": "/functions_arithmetic.yaml"
> }],
> "extensions": [{
> "extensionFunction": {
> "extensionUriReference": 1,
> "functionAnchor": 0,
> "name": "add"
> }
> }],
> "relations": [{
> ```
>
> Should this be something we handle in acero? Or do we need to ask the
duckdb guys to add the extensionUris into their plans?
I see, but I am inclined towards having the URI.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
