lidavidm commented on issue #73:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-nanoarrow/issues/73#issuecomment-1327925578

   Child names aren't necessarily unique.
   
   Child indices would generally work. I don't know the original justification 
off the top of my head, but type IDs as separate from indices would let you 
subset or rearrange a union without rewriting the type IDs array. In practice I 
don't think I've ever run into a case where type IDs != indices.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to