viirya commented on issue #1176: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/1176#issuecomment-1431821201
Thanks @alamb for pinging me. I've read @jorgecarleitao's comments (and previous comments) when it was posted yesterday. I think my feelings come from two aspects. As a downstream crate user of `arrow-rs`, ideally we hope that the unification of `arrow-rs` and `arrow2` wouldn't bring too much API changes, although sometimes it might be not avoidable. Based on the proposed change list and our code dependency, our impact might be slight because there are middle layers like `DataFusion` so some changes will be ingested there, but I'm also wondering how much it could be on projects which are fully coupled with. At first glance at the list of change in @jorgecarleitao's comment, seems at least API stuffs could be existing for a while. As a contributor / maintainer of `arrow-rs` or an open source contributor of Rust arrow implementation, this is a fantastic news definitely. We can contribute to and benefit from others works in one single place. I'd be very pleasant to see this happens, and definitely very willing to help on it. 💪 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
