not-my-profile commented on PR #7175: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/7175#issuecomment-1684547594
Thanks for bringing this up here. I disagree that this PR introduced any new dependency ... it just made the existing dependency explicit. Since I think you should of course be able to implement your own data source scanning execution plan (which previously you could not because of the hard-coded downcasting in the physical plan). So I think the solution here is to move the new `file_scan_config` method to a new `DataSource` trait that execution plans have to implement in order to use them with the physical plan. What do you think? (take what I'm saying with a grain of salt, I'm not that familiar with datafusion). -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
