rok commented on code in PR #41257:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/41257#discussion_r1585212898
##########
docs/source/format/CanonicalExtensions.rst:
##########
@@ -251,6 +251,27 @@ Variable shape tensor
Values inside each **data** tensor element are stored in
row-major/C-contiguous
order according to the corresponding **shape**.
+.. _json_extension:
+
+JSON
+====
+
+* Extension name: `arrow.json`.
+
+* The storage type of this extension is ``StringArray`` or
+ or ``LargeStringArray`` or ``StringViewArray``.
+ Only UTF-8 encoded JSON is supported.
Review Comment:
Does this make sense @emkornfield ?
```suggestion
Only UTF-8 encoded JSON as specified in `rfc8259`_ is supported.
Non-standard encodings using Binary types are not supported.
```
> In the short term we should probably recommend that implementations should
likely reject Binary annotated JSON fields
By this you mean serializing binary data into UTF-8 string and including it
as a String? Is there a downside to allowing it?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
