lidavidm commented on PR #43297: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/43297#issuecomment-2236451492
(3) is the same argument: it may be convenient but it locks you into those methods, and I at least have come around to thinking that is a mistake for non-trivial applications. The disassociated IPC proposal is more flexible than that, and eventually I would like to make the base gRPC transport equally flexible. For (4), if there's people willing to maintain it's possible the conversation may be different. Note that the tests were never fully enabled in CI because of flakiness, so there were already known issues in the implementation. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
