lidavidm commented on PR #43632: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/43632#issuecomment-2303920845
> Change `on_next` to instead be `get_next_task` and create an `ArrowArrayTask` struct that populates the `ArrowDeviceArray` There's the partial compromise option: > Would it be sufficient for that use case if we had a callback approach that produced a task instead of directly producing an array? > >> Off the top of my head, yes, that should be fine. I think you can separate thread transfer from push/pull in that way. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
