felipecrv commented on PR #35: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-experiments/pull/35#issuecomment-2494782210
@amoeba wrote: > * To follow the convention established in other examples in this repo, the `server` and `client` folders should get concise README.md files with instructions on how to prepare an environment to run the example server and client. Could the convention be broken here considering that readers will be better off reading the recommendations and picking a single compression algorithm that they use on their own application? > * The current README has turned into a really useful guidance document which I think should live on the main website. If we did that, this README could be made into a short document like the others in this repo and could link to that guidance document. Goal of this repo is to work as a staging area for content that will eventually move to the official docs. > * The benchmarking you've done in PR comments may be one of the most useful exports of this work. I think that should get published somewhere. Benchmarking compression is very tricky because it depends too much on distribution of the values and using randomly generated data like I did here pretty much defines the compression rate one gets, so it's better that people get a feel for how compression behaves on their workloads, CPU and network bandwidth budgets. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
