mateuszrzeszutek commented on PR #46110:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/46110#issuecomment-2796663577
Looks like the integration tests have failed on the C++ vs Go/Java
comparison:
```
panic: expected: schema:
fields: 1
- id: type=int64, nullable
metadata: ["ARROW:FLIGHT:SQL:TABLE_NAME": "test",
"ARROW:FLIGHT:SQL:IS_AUTO_INCREMENT": "1",
"ARROW:FLIGHT:SQL:IS_CASE_SENSITIVE": "0", "ARROW:FLIGHT:SQL:TYPE_NAME":
"type_test", "ARROW:FLIGHT:SQL:SCHEMA_NAME": "schema_test",
"ARROW:FLIGHT:SQL:IS_SEARCHABLE": "1", "ARROW:FLIGHT:SQL:CATALOG_NAME":
"catalog_test", "ARROW:FLIGHT:SQL:PRECISION": "100"], got: schema:
fields: 1
- id: type=int64, nullable
metadata: ["ARROW:FLIGHT:SQL:TABLE_NAME": "test",
"ARROW:FLIGHT:SQL:IS_AUTO_INCREMENT": "1",
"ARROW:FLIGHT:SQL:IS_CASE_SENSITIVE": "0", "ARROW:FLIGHT:SQL:TYPE_NAME":
"type_test", "ARROW:FLIGHT:SQL:SCHEMA_NAME": "schema_test",
"ARROW:FLIGHT:SQL:IS_SEARCHABLE": "1", "ARROW:FLIGHT:SQL:CATALOG_NAME":
"catalog_test", "ARROW:FLIGHT:SQL:PRECISION": "100",
"ARROW:FLIGHT:SQL:REMARKS": "test column"]
```
I've reverted the changes to the integration test code here.
I assume there's a dependency between this repo and arrow-go/arrow-java --
should they be updated in some sort of order? Or should the assertions in the
other repos be relaxed first?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
