ttomasz commented on PR #376:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs-object-store/pull/376#issuecomment-2927448265

   > Apart from the notes I've left in-line, I'm wondering if we should even 
panic or should rather return an error. This would be in line with all kinds of 
unexpected server answers that we handle so far (e.g. weird status codes, 
broken bodies, TLS failures). The flag would then toggle between "error 
returned" and "error ignored" instead of "panic" and "no panic". WDYT?
   
   Thanks for the review.
   
   In general it would probably be better to pass the error for user to handle 
instead of throwing exception/panicking (or as I mentioned in the linked issue 
there could be a separate interface to get paths as they come i.e. strings 
instead of parsing them into Path objects). Then the flag wouldn't even be 
needed.
   
   But I don't know how that could be implemented without backwards 
incompatible changes.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to